Internet Writing Journal(R)

Index


Homepage

Advertising

Linking to Us

Search

Subscribe




Censorship | Homepage

Apple Bans Murderdrome Comic

MurderdromeApple has banned a violent comic strip named Murderdrome from its Apple App Store. The move has infuriated comic fans reports Fortune's Apple 2.0 blog.
Murderdrome is not Ulysses, Lolita or Lady Chatterley's Lover. It's a dark, bloody comic strip marked by the type of over-the-top violence that has made its genre so popular among young readers with a lot of pent-up rage.

But Murderdrome has now joined the pantheon of suppressed fiction as the first digital book banished from Apple's App Store by censors in Cupertino.
The comic was banned even though it is a book and not an iPhone applications as Mike Cane explains. Technically, it is Comic Reader that is the application. Infurious Comics posted the complete first episode of Murderdrome and invited supportive comments.
By now, you might have heard that Murderdrome has been banned by Apple. This is due to the part of the sdk that suggests content must NOT offend anyone in 'apple's reasonable' opinion. Here at infurious, we would love to work with Apple to ensure a content rating system can be put in place to allow material that is no more offensive than many of the R rated films available to download on iTunes.

PLEASE leave a comment committing your support to us - we'll forward ALL of these to Apple, so that we can ensure that not only Murderdrome, but that ANY comic submitted to Apple doesn't fall foul of the same censorship.
A content rating system sounds very reasonable. This is something Apple should implement if they are worried about the kind of content being published on iTunes.

Posted on August 28, 2008
Permalink | | | Comments (View)



Iran Furious at Salman Rushdie Knighthood

Iran is furious that Great Britain bestowed a knighthood on author Salman Rushdie. The country trotted out the old "insult to Islam" thing and declared that as a result of the knighthood that suicide bombings are now totally justified.
Iran accused Britain yesterday of insulting Islam by awarding a knighthood to Salman Rushdie, whose novel The Satanic Verses prompted the late Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini to issue a fatwa calling for his assassination. Mohammad Ali Hosseini, a spokesman for Iran's foreign ministry, portrayed the decision to honour the novelist as an orchestrated act of aggression directed against Islamic societies, describing Rushdie as "one of the most hated figures" in the Islamic world.

*****

Rushdie returned to public life in 1999, a decade after being forced underground by Khomeini's declaration. He was the most high-profile of the 946 people honoured in the Queen's birthday list, drawn from nominations by the public or expert organisations. A spokesman for the Foreign Office said the honour was "richly deserved" and the reasons for it were "self-explanatory".

*****

In a statement following the announcement of his knighthood on Saturday, Rushdie, 59, said he was "thrilled and humbled to receive this great honour". Literary supporters said the decision to include the novelist among 21 knighthoods was overdue, claiming the British establishment had for many years been reluctant to be associated with the controversial figure.
Rushdie is a brave man. It's amazing that he's still alive, actually. Kudos to the Queen for honoring him.

Posted on June 18, 2007
Permalink | | | Comments (View)

Judy Blume, Books and Censorship

Judy Blume discusses why books for children are now censored more than violent television.
There is so much sex on TV and on billboards today-seemingly more than when Forever first came out-why do you think the book continues to be so controversial?

Because it's a book. Some adults, for whatever reason, have a desperate need to control everything in their children's lives. They can't control what's on television or on a billboard, but many think they can control what their children read. These individuals believe if their kids don't read about it, they won't know about it, and if they don't know about it, they'll never do it. They think they can have a book banned if they don't want their children to read it. They'll go into school waving a book, demanding that it be removed. There are a lot of would-be censors out there. Not only do they want to make the decision for their children but for all children. How much better it would it be if the parents could read the book, too, and then talk about it with their teens.
Judy's next childrens' book is Soupy Saturdays With the Pain and the Great One, which will be published by Delacorte in August.

Posted on May 25, 2007
Permalink | | | Comments (View)



Western Books Banned in Iran

Western books have now been banned in Iran. The local publishing industry is in chaos, because under the strict new censorship rules, only textbooks can be imported from the West.
Dozens of literary masterpieces and international bestsellers have been banned in Iran in a dramatic rise in censorship that has plunged the country's publishing industry into crisis. Companies that once specialised in popular fiction and other money-spinners are being restricted to academic texts under a cultural freeze instigated by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Several thousand new and previously published works have been blacklisted by Iran's culture and Islamic guidance ministry, which vets all books.

Terry Chevalier's best-selling novel Girl With a Pearl Earring has been banned after completing six print runs. Dozens of literary masterpieces and international bestsellers have been banned in Iran in a dramatic rise in censorship that has plunged the country's publishing industry into crisis. Companies that once specialised in popular fiction and other money-spinners are being restricted to academic texts under a cultural freeze instigated by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Several thousand new and previously published works have been blacklisted by Iran's culture and Islamic guidance ministry, which vets all books.

Newly banned books include Farsi translations of Tracy Chevalier's best-seller Girl With a Pearl Earring and Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code, the latter for upsetting clerics within Iran's tiny Christian community. Chevalier's novel has completed six print runs in Iran and earned hefty profits for its local publisher, Cheshme.

Another publishing house has been banned from selling a successful series of books featuring lyrics by the Beatles, the Rolling Stones, the Doors, Black Sabbath, Queen and Guns n' Roses. Stores were told to remove the books or face closure. Permission was subsequently denied for the publisher to reprint. The crackdown also covers classics, such as William Faulkner's As I Lay Dying, and scores of works by Iranian authors.
This is absolutely apalling. It's a very disturbing trend that is growing: Turkey is busy imprisoning writers who "insult Turkishness" and now Iranians can't read William Faulkner or any "subversive" Iranian authors.

Posted on December 7, 2006
Permalink | | | Comments (View)

Graphic Novels Banned at Library

After two graphic novels were pulled from the shelves of the Marshall Public Library in Marhsall, Missouri at the request of a patron, the library is forming a committee to determine what books are suitable for the library to carry. Publishers Weekly reports:
Amy Crump, director of the Marshall Public Library, said once the new policy is place the two books will be reconsidered for circulation under the new guidelines, "as if they were new." Fun Home and Blankets were challenged earlier this month by a Marshall patron who claimed the books were inappropriate because of explicit graphics.

Crump said this is the first time any book has been challenged by a library patron, "which is probably why we've never had a selection policy." She said the new policy,"is not aimed at just these two books," and once implemented, "we'll be able to make decisions about all kinds of books." The materials selection committee will include six of the eight members of the board and two or three library staffers experienced in collection development, said Crump. "The committee will consult with other libraries about their policies and with attorneys," she said. The process of developing the guidelines and gettting approval by the board will take a minimum of two months.

The Marshall library has approximately 75 graphic novels in its collection. All books, including graphic novels, are placed in adult, young adult or children's sections as appropriate. Fun Home, Bechdel's story of growing up a lesbian with a closeted gay father, was placed in the adult nonfiction section, said Crump, while Blankets, an autobiographical story about Thompson's Christian fundamentalist childhood, was originally in the young adult section.
Is it just us, or is this whole "censoring books in libraries" thing getting worse instead of better? You can read more about the issue in general Comic Book Legal Defense Fund's website.

Posted on October 13, 2006
Permalink | | | Comments (View)



Top Five Most Challenged Books in 2005

Banned Books WeekThis week (September 23-30) is Banned Books Week. It is also the 25th anniversary of Banned Books Week. The ALA says there were 405 known attempts to remove books in 2005. These attempts include "formal, written complaints filed with a library or school requesting that materials be removed because of content or appropriateness." The ALA has also listed the following books as the five most challenged books of 2005.
  • It's Perfectly Normal by Robie Harris
  • Forever by Judy Blume
  • The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger
  • The Chocolate War by Robert Cormier
  • Whale Talk by Chris Crutcher
  • Banned Books Week is sponsored by the American Booksellers Association, the American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression, the ALA, the Association of American Publishers, the American Society of Journalists and Authors, and the National Association of College Stores. It is also endorsed by the Library of Congress Center for the Book.

    Posted on September 28, 2006
    Permalink | | | Comments (View)

    Journalist Perihan Magden Acquitted of Charges of Criticizing Turkish Government

    Turkish journalist and writer Perihan Magden has been acquitted of charges under Article 301 of the Turkish consitution, which allows no criticism of the government or its policies.
    Istanbul's second criminal court of first instance ruled yesterday that an article defending the rights of a conscientious objector amounted to "heavy criticism conveyed within the scope of freedom of expression" and did not constitute a crime.

    In her column, published in the weekly Yeni Aktuel magazine last December, Magden defended conscientious objector Mehmet Tarhan who was sentenced to a record four-year term in a military prison for disobedience after refusing to wear his military uniform. She argued that Turkey needed to establish a civilian service as an alternative to compulsory military conscription.

    *****

    Magden is one of a string of writers and journalists to stand trial for expressing opinions. Earlier this month the case against the bestselling author Elif Shafak, charged under Article 301 for "insulting Turkishness" in her latest novel, was reopened.

    The novelist Orhan Pamuk faced similar charges for commenting on the mass killings of Armenians by Turks around the time of the first world war. The charges against Pamuk were dropped for technical reasons late last year amid intense international pressure.
    Turkey clearly has no intention of changing its policies and only acquitted Perihan Magden because a conviction would probably stop Turkey from being allowed in the European Union. And if the EU decides to let Turkey in the union, no doubt the country will start a new, brutal clampdown on writers and journalists.

    Posted on August 1, 2006
    Permalink | | | Comments (View)

    New Indecency Fines Threaten PBS

    The new indecency laws passed by Congress in response to the legendary Janet Jackson/Justin Timberlake Superbowl Halftime Show are now thretening PBS. Yes, that's right, PBS. The new fines are so steep that they will create a chilling effect on programming. The particular program PBS is worried about is a World War II documentary in which former soldiers use some salty language.
    The U.S. government's crackdown on media indecency could prevent World War Two veterans from sharing their stories in an upcoming TV documentary series by Ken Burns, the head of the Public Broadcasting Service said on Wednesday. Noted filmmaker Burns' highly anticipated seven-part series "The War" features salty language used by servicemen and others. If the expletives make it to air, they could lead to crippling fines for the offending stations as a result of a new law signed last month by President George W. Bush.

    Paula Kerger, the president and CEO of PBS, told reporters at a media event in Pasadena, California, that she was reluctant to bleep the words out, because that would diminish the impact of the documentary. Airing the film after 10 p.m., when the new rules do not apply, would reduce the available audience, she said. "The American people need to know this is not about Janet Jackson," Kerger said, referring to the singer's breast-baring turn at the 2004 Super Bowl halftime show. The incident sent shockwaves through Capitol Hill and spurred the bipartisan push to boost fines for indecency violations.

    Under the new law, fines rise to as much as $325,000 per violation from $32,500. Television and radio broadcasters are barred from airing obscene material and are limited from broadcasting indecent material between the hours of 6 a.m. and 10 p.m., times when children are likely to be watching. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has defined indecency as "language or material that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards for the broadcast medium, sexual or excretory organs or activities."

    Karger said she had unsuccessfully tried to get advance clearance for the documentary from the five members of the Republican-controlled broadcast regulator. But the FCC's policy is not to deliver an opinion before a broadcast.
    First off, the new fines are ludicrous. And second of all, for the FCC to refuse to render an opinion before the broadcast is absolutely outrageous. So now we can't even listed to a decorated war veteran talk about his life because he might use some "salty" language? It's absolute idiocy. And the "no prior rulings" policy seems clearly aimed at destroying public television, which is already under fire as it is.

    Posted on July 28, 2006
    Permalink | | | Comments (View)

    Turkey Continues to Persecute Writers

    Turkey continues to persecute any writer who dares to write a history of the country that is in any way critical of the Turkish government or its previous actions.
    The case against Turkish author Elif Shafak, who is charged with "insulting Turkishness" under Article 301 in the Turkish Criminal Code, was reopened. Shafak wrote "The Bastard of Istanbul," in which a character references Armenian genocide, Thebookstandard.com reported Tuesday.

    An Istanbul public prosecutor dismissed the charges last month, based on arguments that the book is a work of fiction and therefore cannot be prosecuted. But a complaint from a member of the Unity of Jurists caused the seventh high criminal court to overrule the decision. Similar charges have also been brought against Shafak's translator Asli Bican and publisher Semi Soekmen, of the Metis Publishing House.

    "The situation in Turkey has changed since the introduction of Article 301 last year," Director of the Writers in Prison Committee at International PEN Sara Whyatt, told Thebookstandard. "I think the trials are intended to harass and intimidate these writers and journalists. Elif Shafak is at the beginning of what could be a long and painful process."
    Turkey has a continuing pattern of repression and persecution of fiction and nonfiction authors who write something that the government doesn't agree with. Orhan Pamuk just barely escaped being thrown in jail for life for "insulting Turkishness" when the rest of the world expressed outrage over the charges. But apparently, Turkey hasn't changed its policies at all: Elif Shafak is merely its latest target for persecution.

    Posted on July 18, 2006
    Permalink | | | Comments (View)

    Sergey Brin Admits Google Compromised Its Principles On China Deal

    Google co-founder Sergey Brin admitted that Google compromised its principles when it cut a deal with China in which it agreed to censor sites that the Chinese government doesn't approve of.
    Google Inc. co-founder Sergey Brin acknowledged Tuesday the dominant Internet company has compromised its principles by accommodating Chinese censorship demands. He said Google is wrestling to make the deal work before deciding whether to reverse course.

    Meeting with reporters near Capitol Hill, Brin said Google had agreed to the censorship demands only after Chinese authorities blocked its service in that country. Google's rivals accommodated the same demands — which Brin described as "a set of rules that we weren't comfortable with" — without international criticism, he said. "We felt that perhaps we could compromise our principles but provide ultimately more information for the Chinese and be a more effective service and perhaps make more of a difference," Brin said.

    *****

    Brin visited Washington to ask U.S. senators to approve a plan that would prevent telephone and cable companies from collecting premium fees from companies such as Google, Microsoft and Yahoo! for faster delivery of their services. Brin, dressed casually in jeans, sneakers and a black sport jacket, said he wasn't sure whether he changed any lawmakers' minds. Google's China-approved Web service omits politically sensitive information that might be retrieved during Internet searches, such as details about the 1989 suppression of political unrest in Tiananmen Square. Its agreement with China has provoked considerable criticism from human rights groups. "Perhaps now the principled approach makes more sense," Brin said.
    Do you think Sergey really wore jeans when trying to lobby members of Congress? He needs to make a good impression, because we really don't want telephone and cable companies collecting premium fees from anyone to get priority delivery of their services. Net Neutrality is clearly the way to go.

    Posted on June 7, 2006
    Permalink | | | Comments (View)



    The Writers Write
    Lifestyle Network
    Bloggers Blog
    Crafters Craft
    Drivers Drive
    Fantasy SF Blog
    Gamers Game
    Health News Blog
    HowToWeb.com
    The IWJ Blog
    Lovers Love
    Media Cynic
    Petosphere
    Pleasant Morning Buzz
    Readers Read
    Science News Blog
    Shopping Blog
    Singers Sing
    Surfers Surf
    Traders Trade
    Video Nacho
    Watchers Watch
    Workers Work
    The Write New
    Writer's Blog











    www.internetwritingjournal.com

    Writers Write® | The Write NewsTM | Readers ReadTM
    Advertising | Archives | Classifieds | Jobs | RSS Feeds | Subscribe

    Copyright © 1997-2009 by Writers Write, Inc. All Rights Reserved.