|
|

January, 2007 Archives | Homepage
Germ-free Paper for Hospitals, Offices and Writers
HTLounge reports that Domtar has come out with a line of antimicrobial paper.
We can certainly see this product gaining favor in hospitals and offices run by germophobes, and the like. It's antimicrobial paper, and it's being brought to market by a company called Domtar.
A special silver compound coats the paper, preventing it from growing bacteria, fungus, mold, mildew, and even odors. Moreover, it keeps the dreaded staphylococcus aureus away, that diabolical MRSA that we've heard about so much lately.
You don't need any special equipment to store or use this paper, which can sit on the shelf without festering for much, much longer than normal paper. It's white, of course, and has a high amount of brightness, which should give you a good feeling about using it for presentations as well.
Wired's Bodyhack blog isn't too excited about the germ-free paper but we think it is good idea. Keeping fungus, mold and mildew off old papers might be a great help to writers with allergies. You can read more about the paper here on Domtar's website.
Posted on January 30, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google | Technorati
| |
Oprah Chooses New Book
Oprah Winfrey has chosen another memoir for her new Book Club selection, but it's nothing like the disastrous James Frey fantasy passing itself off as a memoir A Million Little Pieces. Oprah has played it safe choosing The Measure of a Man: A Spiritual Autobiography (Harper San Francisco).
Measure is the first title Oprah has given her seal of approval to since James Frey's memoir, A Million Little Pieces, was exposed as partially fabricated and caused Winfrey considerable embarrassment. Oprah's Book Club has been a major boon to the publishing industry; her imprimatur on a title means gold at the checkout counter.
Originally published in September 2000, The Measure of a Man is Poitier's second memoir and recounts his rise from an impoverished childhood on Cat Island in the Bahamas to his Oscar-winning film career. The book includes meditations on integrity, commitment, faith and forgiveness and finding meaningful pleasures in life. The book sold 125,000 hardcovers and paperbacks in its first run, according to the publisher.
Winfrey was chastened when the Smoking Gun Web site revealed that Frey had faked significant portions of A Million Little Pieces, a book she heavily promoted through her club and initially defended. That book had gone on to sell some 1.7 million copies following her imprimatur and in excess of three million copies in all.
Despite the scandal, Winfrey still managed to turn a revised edition of Nobel laureate Elie Wiesel's Holocaust memoir Night into a million-copy bestseller.
Mark Tauber, vice president and deputy publisher of HarperSanFrancisco, called Poitier's memoir "a great inspirational story about an authentic life.
Oprah loves these kinds of stories," he added in a telephone interview today, "and she's never been shy about saying how much he's been important to her career. It makes a lot of sense."
It's an interesting and inspiring autobiography. And we feel quite certain that Sidney Poitier won't pull a Franzen on Oprah. You can see list of past Oprah pics on ReadersRead.com's list of Oprah's Book Club Pics.
Posted on January 27, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google | Technorati
| |
How Scott Westerfield Names His Characters
Author Scott Westerfield provides some insight into how he names his characters in this post on his blog called Westerblog.
But Uglies takes place 300 years in the future. Names probably won't be the same as now. So I needed something that's not a current name, but that doesn’t make your brain fritz when you read it. So I chose a regular word in English.
That's right: "tally" as in "count." As in "Hey, Mr. Tally-man, tally me bananas."
Thus, the little spell-checker in your brain doesn't ping every time your eyes scan across those letters. (And the real-world MS Word spell-checker doesn’t draw a squiggly line under it.) "Tally" is capitalized, of course, so you know it's a name, but otherwise "tally" reads as a perfectly normal word.
But not too common. When’s the last time you actually used the verb "tally" in a sentence, like "Let me tally those Scrabble scores for you, Old Chum?" Too common could be very bad, like if you named a main character Ask, or Her, or The. (Actually, "Said" would be the worst. Even writing about the late writer Edward Said can be quite tricky.)
Scott Westerfield is the author of young adult science fiction novels. His current series -- The Uglies Trilogy -- takes place in a futuristic society (see Uglies, Pretties and Special. His post about character names ended up being boingled -- which means the Boing Boing blog blogged about it.
Posted on January 25, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google | Technorati
| |
Lifetime Gets Rights to The Memory Keeper's Daughter
Lifetime has purchased the rights to the Kim Edwards' bestselling novel, The Memory Keeper's Daughter.
According to Variety, it's the kind of family drama that the movie companies aren't making anymore; producer Howard Braunstein compares the novel to Ordinary People and Kramer vs. Kramer.
No word when The Memory Keeper's Daughter will go into production.
Lifetime has been doing novel adapatations like crazy lately. Starting next Monday for four consecutive Mondays, Lifetime is airing four original films based on Nora Roberts novels. First up is Heather Locklear and Johnathon Schaech, who are starring in the first film,
Angels Fall, which features Locklear as a woman who witnesses a brutal massacre and who is pulled into another murder mystery. Angels Fall premieres Monday, January 29, at 9 PM (ET/PT) on Lifetime.
Posted on January 24, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google | Technorati
| |
Inkless Metal Pen
Gizmodo reports that a stainless steel metal pen writes without using any ink. The 'nib' of the pen is a metal alloy that leaves a pencil-like mark when the pen is used on paper. The Grand Illusions website explains how the pen works.
In the Medieval period, artists and scribes often used a metal stylus in order to draw on a specially prepared paper surface. Generally known as Metalpoint, or Silverpoint when the stylus was made of silver, artists such as Leonardo da Vinci, Dürer and Rembrandt all used this technique. http://www.silverpointweb.com/index.html gives a lot of information about how it works.
The pens we sell are a modern version (and do not use silver). The solid metal 'nib' consists of a metal alloy, that leaves a mark on most types of paper. If you use the sort of paper typically used in printers and photocopiers, the pen leaves a mark that looks as if it was made by a pencil. However the line will not smudge, and cannot be rubbed out.
Since there is no ink, there is nothing to dry out, so the pen will work just as well in 25 years time as it does today. And of course it never needs sharpening!
The unique pen retails for $30. (via Boing Boing)
Posted on January 18, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google | Technorati
| |
Plutoed Named Word of the Year
The BBC reports that the American Dialect Society has voted "Plutoed" as the 2006 word of the year.
"Plutoed" has been chosen as word of the year for 2006 by the American Dialect Society, beating "climate canary" in a run-off vote.
If you have been "plutoed" you have been demoted or devalued, just as happened to the former planet Pluto when its status was downgraded.
A "climate canary" is something whose poor health indicates a looming environmental catastrophe.
This is the 17th time ADS members have voted to choose a word of the year.
You probably remember the Pluto debate from earlier this year when Pluto was demoted as a planet. Here are a few of the other words that were in the running:
flog - an advertisement disguised as a blog or web log
prohibited liquids - "fluids that cannot be transported by passengers on airplanes"
macaca - "an American citizen treated as an alien"
Posted on January 17, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google | Technorati
| |
Jason Isaacs Loves His Job
Jason Isaacs, who does such a fabulous job of portraying Lucius Malfoy in the Harry Potter films, told Cindy White of Sci Fi Wire that he is delighted that he will have more to do in the next Harry Potter film. He also shared how he begged J.K. Rowling to write his character some great lines in the last Harry Potter book.
Jason Isaacs, who plays Lucius Malfoy in the Harry Potter film franchise, told SCI FI Wire that he'll have a lot more to do in the upcoming fifth film, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, including (spoiler!) a wand-to-wand fight with Sirius Black (Gary Oldman). "I had virtually nothing to do in number four," Isaacs said in an interview at the Television Critics Association winter press tour in Pasadena, Calif., where he was promoting his upcoming BBC America miniseries The State Within. "In fact, when there's nothing to do like that, and they say, 'Do you want to come in for a couple of weeks?' you go, 'Well, I'm busy. Oh, God. All right.' Because the thought that somebody else might wear my wig is just too painful. But I have a little bit more to do in this."
*****
Isaacs said that the fifth film will include a harrowing showdown between his character and Harry's godfather, Sirius Black. "I get to have a wand battle with Gary Oldman, possibly my favorite actor in the universe," Isaacs said. "We get to play around like two 10-year-olds. And with kind of unlimited sci-fi imagination. It's fun. We just go, 'Well, how about if I ... .' And anything you finish that sentence with, they go, 'Yeah, OK. You can do that.' So it was magnificent."
The character does not appear in the sixth book, Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, but Isaacs said he recently had an opportunity to meet author J.K. Rowling and appealed to her to include him in the seventh and final book, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, due this year, possibly July. "I fell to my knees and begged," he joked. "It didn't do any good. I'm sure she doesn't need plot ideas from me. But I made my point. We'll see. Like everybody else, I'm holding my breath to July to see what's in there. I just want to bust out of prison, that's all. I don't want to stay in Azkaban most of my life."
Jason Isaacs does such a fantastic job as the delightfully evil Lucius Malfoy. We hope that Jo was at least somewhat sympathetic to his heartfelt plea for more screen time.
Posted on January 15, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google | Technorati
| |
Top New Line Exec Blasts Peter Jackson
The war between New Line and Peter Jackson has escalated once again. The co-chairman of New Line Bob Shaye has said that Peter Jackson will never be allowed to make a film with New Line while he is in charge.
"It will never happen during my watch," Shaye said of Jackson directing "The Hobbit" along with an "LOTR" prequel. New Line and MGM own the rights to both films.
Shaye's words are a more explicit snub to Jackson than occurred last November, when Jackson posted a letter to his fans on the "LOTR" fan site Theonering.net saying that New Line had alerted him that they were proceeding to make "The Hobbit" without him.
The severing of ties was prompted by Jackson's declared refusal to make a movie with New Line until his ongoing lawsuit is settled. (Suit was filed in August 2005 after accounting issues were raised in a partial audit of the first "LOTR" film.) New Line told Jackson that because the studio's option to the property, obtained from Saul Zaentz, was set to expire, New Line would proceed sans Jackson.
People close to the situation say the lawsuit is nowhere near being settled.
Shaye's attack was more acerbic, and definitive, than simply walking away from the table.
*****
Jackson got "a quarter of a billion dollars paid to him so far, justifiably, according to contract, completely right, and this guy ... turns around without wanting to have a discussion with us and sues us and refused to discuss it unless we just give in to his plan," Shaye said. "I don't want to work with that guy anymore. Why would I? So the answer is, he will never make any movie with New Line Cinema again while I'm still working at the company."
Shaye also went on to say that he was "offended" that Jackson, as well as several "LOTR" thesps ("because, I'm guessing, of Peter's complaint") would not participate in a video celebrating New Line's 40th anniversary.
On Wednesday, Jackson issued a statement in response to Shaye's outburst, saying, "It is regrettable that Bob has chosen to make (the argument) personal. I have always had the highest respect and affection for Bob and other senior management at New Line and continue to do so."
Jackson addressed the suit by saying: "Contrary to recent comments made by Bob Shaye, we attempted to discuss the issues raised by the 'Fellowship' audit with New Line for over a year, but the studio was and continues to be completely uncooperative. This has compelled us to file a lawsuit to pursue our contractual rights under the law. Nobody likes legal action, but the studio left us with no alternative."
Meanwhile, MGM let stand its statement that it would love to distribute a movie by Peter Jackson (MGM owns the distribution rights). This is beyond annoying. Settle the blasted lawsuit and make The Hobbit.
Posted on January 10, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google | Technorati
| |
P.D. James Pleased With Film Version of Children of Men
The new film, Children of Men is based on the dystopian novel of the same name by bestselling British author P.D. James. In the novel, the human race has inexplicably become incapable of reproducing. Theo, a revolutionary leader played by Clive Owen must protect a young pregnant immigrant girl who may be humankind's last hope. He must smuggle the girl out of the country and deliver her to the ultra-secretive Human Project.
Director Alfonso Cuarón quite a few things when he adapted the book to a movie format, but reportedly P.D. James is quite happy with the film, which is receiving stellar reviews. Cuarón discusses his vision of the film with Sci Fi's Mike Szymanski:
We heard that you weren't interested in doing a science-fiction project at first. Is that true?
Cuarón: True. I was not interested in the project. I didn't respond to the material. I was not interested in doing science fiction. ... The book takes place in a very posh universe. I love [P.D.] James, but I couldn't see myself doing the movie. Nevertheless the premise kept on haunting me, for weeks and weeks and weeks. ... I used the book as a jumping-off point.
Did you divert a lot from the book?
Cuarón: Yes. In the book Kee doesn't exist; it's [the] Julianne Moore [character] who was pregnant, and we just took a big departure there. ... We did have to honor the part of the story of the immigration [addressed in the book], but we created the whole thing with the refugees. We took the book as a point of departure to look at the state of men now, and added things like the Homeland Security and the whole idea of what is happening outside in the world.
Did the author see the final version of the film?
Cuarón: She did see the final version, and it is quite different, and she said she is proud to be associated with the film.
Cuarón, who is best known to general audiences for being the director of Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban has a reputation for being respectful of an author's work. J.K. Rowling reportedly was happy with his work and he is in the running to direct another Potter film. Children of Men -- which we can't wait to see -- is playing in theaters nationwide.
Posted on January 8, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google | Technorati
| |
Libraries Dump the Classics
The Washington Post reports that the classics are disappearing from the shelves of Fairfax County, Virginia libraries. The reason given by the library for the dumping of the likes of Hemingway in favor of popular books? No one checked out certain classics in two years, so they're gone in favor of more popular fiction.
You can't find "Abraham Lincoln: His Speeches and Writings" at the Pohick Regional Library anymore. Or "The Education of Henry Adams" at Sherwood Regional. Want Emily Dickinson's "Final Harvest"? Don't look to the Kingstowne branch.
It's not that the books are checked out. They're just gone. No one was reading them, so librarians took them off the shelves and dumped them.
Along with those classics, thousands of novels and nonfiction works have been eliminated from the Fairfax County collection after a new computer software program showed that no one had checked them out in at least 24 months.
Public libraries have always weeded out old or unpopular books to make way for newer titles. But the region's largest library system is taking turnover to a new level.
Like Borders and Barnes & Noble, Fairfax is responding aggressively to market preferences, calculating the system's return on its investment by each foot of space on the library shelves -- and figuring out which products will generate the biggest buzz. So books that people actually want are easy to find, but many books that no one is reading are gone -- even if they are classics.
"We're being very ruthless," said Sam Clay, director of the 21-branch system since 1982. "A book is not forever. If you have 40 feet of shelf space taken up by books on tulips and you find that only one is checked out, that's a cost."
That is the new reality for the Fairfax system and the future for other libraries. As books on tape, DVDs, computers and other electronic equipment crowd into branches, there is less room for plain old books.
So librarians are making hard decisions and struggling with a new issue: whether the data-driven library of the future should cater to popular tastes or set a cultural standard, even as the demand for the classics wanes.
Library officials say they will always stock Shakespeare's plays, "The Great Gatsby" and other venerable titles. And many of the books pulled from one Fairfax library can be found at another branch and delivered to a patron within a week.
But in the effort to stay relevant in an age in which reference materials and novels can be found on the Internet and Oprah's Book Club helps set standards of popularity, libraries are not the cultural repositories they once were.
"I think the days of libraries saying, 'We must have that, because it's good for people,' are beyond us," said Leslie Burger, president of the American Library Association and director of Princeton Public Library. "There is a sense in many public libraries that popular materials are what most of our communities desire. Everybody's got a favorite book they're trying to promote."
This story is so apalling that we can hardly respond in a coherent fashion. Libraries aren't bookstores. The classics shouldn't be dumped just because more people read Grisham than read the writings of Abraham Lincoln. Our very culture is being destroyed by this new, mercenary way of running a library like a bookstore. Read the entire article -- and be horrified.
Posted on January 3, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google | Technorati
| |
| |
|
|